4.5 Article

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio on admission to predict the severity and mortality of COVID-19 patients: A meta-analysis

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
卷 42, 期 -, 页码 60-69

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.01.006

关键词

COVID-19; Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; Severity; Mortality; Meta-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) levels upon admission were associated with severe COVID-19 and mortality. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal cut-off value for NLR before clinical use.
Background: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), an inflammatory marker, was suggested to be predictive of severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients. Here, we investigated whether NLR levels on admission could predict the severity and mortality of COVID-19 patients. Methods: A literature search wasconducted on 23 July 2020 to retrieve all published articles, including grey literature and preprints, investigating the association between on-admission NLR values and severity or mortality in COVID-19 patients. A meta-analysis was performed to determine the overall standardized mean difference (SMD) in NLR values and the pooled risk ratio (RR) for severity and mortality with the 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI). Results: A total of 38 articles, including 5699 patients with severity outcomes and 6033 patients with mortality outcomes, were included. The meta-analysis showed that severe and non-survivors of COVID-19 had higher on-admission NLR levels than non-severe and survivors (SMD 0.88; 95%CI 0.72-1.04; I-2 75.52% and 1.87; 95%CI 1.25-2.49; I-2 = 97.81%, respectively). Regardless of the different NLR cut-off values, the pooled mortality RR in patients with elevated vs. normal NLR levels was 2.74 (95%CI 0.98-7.66). Conclusion: High NLR levels on admission were associated with severe COVID-19 and mortality. Further studies need to focus on determining the optimal cut-off value for NLR before clinical use. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据