4.5 Article

Grassland productivity estimates informed by soil moisture measurements: Statistical and mechanistic approaches

期刊

AGRONOMY JOURNAL
卷 113, 期 4, 页码 3498-3517

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/agj2.20709

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. U.S. Department of the Interior South-Central Climate Adaptation Science Center [G18AC00278]
  2. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [OKL03123]
  3. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2013-69002]
  4. Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources at Oklahoma State University
  5. Joint Fire Science Program [JFSP 11-1-2-19]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found a statistical relationship between soil moisture measurements and grassland biomass yield, and developed a biomass-yield model capable of assimilating soil moisture data. The mechanistic model with soil moisture data assimilation produced more accurate estimates of wild-hay yields, demonstrating the potential benefits of using in situ soil moisture for grassland productivity estimates.
Soil moisture is a fundamental determinant of plant growth, but soil moisture measurements are rarely assimilated into grassland productivity models, in part because methods of incorporating such data into statistical and mechanistic yield models have not been adequately investigated. Therefore, our objectives were to (a) quantify statistical relationships between in situ soil moisture measurements and biomass yield on grasslands in Oklahoma and (b) develop a simple, mechanistic biomass-yield model for grasslands capable of assimilating in situ soil moisture data. Soil moisture measurements (as fraction of available water capacity, FAW) explained 60% of the variability in county-level wild hay yield reported by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). We next evaluated the performance of mechanistic, evapotranspiration (ET)-driven grassland productivity models with and without assimilation of measured FAW into the models' water balance routines. Models were calibrated by comparing estimated ET with ET measured using eddy covariance, and calibration proved essential for accurate ET estimates. Models were validated by comparing NASS county-level hay yields to the modeled yields, which were the product of normalized transpiration estimates (the ratio of transpiration to reference ET) and an empirically derived grassland water productivity (the ratio of accumulated biomass to normalized transpiration) estimate. The mechanistic model produced more accurate estimates of wild-hay yields with soil moisture data assimilation (Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency [NSE] = 0.55) than without (NSE = 0.10). These results suggest that improved estimates of grassland productivity could be achieved using in situ soil moisture, which could benefit grazing management decisions, wildfire preparedness, and disaster assistance programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据