4.8 Article

Interface-Constrained Layered Double Hydroxides for Stable Uranium Capture in Highly Acidic Industrial Wastewater

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 13, 期 15, 页码 17988-17997

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c01960

关键词

interface-constrained strategy; dendritic fibrous nanosilica; layered double hydroxides; uranium capture

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [5200020802]
  2. Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China [2019TQ0284, 2020M672269, 2020M672271]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFA0706802]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synergy of Mg-Co LDHs and DFNS in DFNS@Mg-Co LDH not only improves the acid endurance of Mg-Co LDH under harsh conditions but also increases the active sites of DFNS, resulting in a significant increase in U(VI) uptake capacity. The interface-constrained strategy provides LDH materials with durability under extremely acidic conditions and high adsorption capacity, showing promise for uranium capture from various water fields.
Low acid endurance of layered double hydroxides (LDHs) limits their uranium(VI) [U(VI)] adsorption capability from harsh industrial wastewater. Here, we demonstrate magnesium-cobalt LDHs (Mg-Co LDHs) anchored in situ onto the pore channel of dendritic fibrous nanosilica (DFNS) via an interface-constrained strategy. The synergy of Mg-Co LDHs and DFNS not only improves the endurance of the Mg-Co LDH under harsh acidic conditions but also increases the number of active sites of DFNS. Thus, DFNS@Mg-Co LDH shows a high U(VI) uptake capacity (1143 mg g(-1)) at pH = 3 and C-0 = 598.7 mg L-1, which is about 4.8-fold higher than that of pristine DFNS. The DFNS@Mg-Co LDH exhibits excellent U(VI) uptake in various background water circumstances due to its acid endurance and highly selective adsorption. This interface-constrained strategy provides LDH materials with durability under extremely acidic conditions along with a high adsorption capacity, which is promising for uranium capture from various water fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据