4.7 Article

Space Biology Research and Biosensor Technologies: Past, Present, and Future

期刊

BIOSENSORS-BASEL
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bios11020038

关键词

space biology; deep space; biosensors; space radiation; microgravity; CubeSats

资金

  1. Advanced Exploration Systems Program Office at NASA Headquarters

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In light of future missions beyond LEO and the potential establishment of bases on the Moon and Mars, research on the effects of the deep space environment on biology is essential. The upcoming deep space biological missions will focus on microbial organisms and plant seeds using miniaturized technologies, with CubeSats playing a key role in exploring relevant space environments.
In light of future missions beyond low Earth orbit (LEO) and the potential establishment of bases on the Moon and Mars, the effects of the deep space environment on biology need to be examined in order to develop protective countermeasures. Although many biological experiments have been performed in space since the 1960s, most have occurred in LEO and for only short periods of time. These LEO missions have studied many biological phenomena in a variety of model organisms, and have utilized a broad range of technologies. However, given the constraints of the deep space environment, upcoming deep space biological missions will be largely limited to microbial organisms and plant seeds using miniaturized technologies. Small satellites such as CubeSats are capable of querying relevant space environments using novel, miniaturized instruments and biosensors. CubeSats also provide a low-cost alternative to larger, more complex missions, and require minimal crew support, if any. Several have been deployed in LEO, but the next iterations of biological CubeSats will travel beyond LEO. They will utilize biosensors that can better elucidate the effects of the space environment on biology, allowing humanity to return safely to deep space, venturing farther than ever before.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据