4.6 Article

COVID-19 Detection by Optimizing Deep Residual Features with Improved Clustering-Based Golden Ratio Optimizer

期刊

DIAGNOSTICS
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11020315

关键词

COVID-19 detection; CGRO algorithm; deep features; meta-heuristic; feature selection; CT-scan; chest X-ray

资金

  1. Energy Cloud R&D Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT [2019M3F2A1073164]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government (MSIT) [2020R1A2C1A01011131]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The COVID-19 virus is spreading rapidly worldwide and early detection is crucial. Currently, there are three main detection methods including RT-PCR, CT, and X-ray. A computational model for automatic COVID-19 detection has been proposed, achieving high accuracies on publicly available datasets.
The COVID-19 virus is spreading across the world very rapidly. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared it a global pandemic on 11 March 2020. Early detection of this virus is necessary because of the unavailability of any specific drug. The researchers have developed different techniques for COVID-19 detection, but only a few of them have achieved satisfactory results. There are three ways for COVID-19 detection to date, those are real-time reverse transcription-polymerize chain reaction (RT-PCR), Computed Tomography (CT), and X-ray plays. In this work, we have proposed a less expensive computational model for automatic COVID-19 detection from Chest X-ray and CT-scan images. Our paper has a two-fold contribution. Initially, we have extracted deep features from the image dataset and then introduced a completely novel meta-heuristic feature selection approach, named Clustering-based Golden Ratio Optimizer (CGRO). The model has been implemented on three publicly available datasets, namely the COVID CT-dataset, SARS-Cov-2 dataset, and Chest X-Ray dataset, and attained state-of-the-art accuracies of 99.31%, 98.65%, and 99.44%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据