4.7 Article

Different role of second phase in the micro-galvanic corrosion of WE43 Mg alloy in NaCl and Na2SO4 solution

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNESIUM AND ALLOYS
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 1598-1608

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jma.2020.12.013

关键词

Mg rare earth alloy; Second phase; Micro-galvanic corrosion; Anode role; Solution anion

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0301001, 2016YFB0301101]
  2. Major Projects for Collaborative Innovation of Zhengzhou [18XTZX12010]
  3. Certificate of Postdoctoral Research Grant in Henan Province [201903011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of the second phase in the micro-galvanic corrosion of a commercial Mg alloy was investigated. The second phase was found to be more active than the Mg matrix, acting as an anode and preferentially dissolving in Na2SO4 solution. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the corrosion rate of the alloy was higher in Na2SO4 solution compared to NaCl solution.
Effect of the second phase in the micro-galvanic corrosion of a commercial Mg alloy containing rare earth elements, cast WE43 alloy, was investigated in 0.6M NaCl solution and 0.6M Na2SO4 solution by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations, scanning Kelvin probe force microscopy (SKPFM) analysis, hydrogen evolution, weight loss measurement, and electrochemical techniques. It is confirmed that the second phase of cast WE43 alloy is more active than Mg matrix and exhibits an anodic role in the micro-galvanic corrosion with a-Mg matrix as cathode and dissolves preferentially in Na2SO4 solution, in contrast to the situation in NaCl solution. The corrosion rate of cast WE43 alloy in Na2SO4 solution is much higher than that in NaCl solution, which is different from the conventional wisdom and could be attributed to the different role of the second phase in the micro-galvanic corrosion in two solutions. (C) 2019 Chongqing University. Publishing services provided by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据