4.8 Article

Anionic, Cationic, and Nonionic Surfactants in Atmospheric Aerosols from the Baltic Coast at Asko, Sweden: Implications for Cloud Droplet Activation

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 50, 期 6, 页码 2974-2982

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b05809

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council FORMAS [2009-224]
  2. French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
  3. U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF)
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1303763] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Chemistry [1303763] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent analyses of atmospheric aerosols from different regions have demonstrated the ubiquitous presence of strong surfactants and evidenced surface tension values, sigma, below 40 mN m(-1), suspected to enhance the cloud-forming potential of these aerosols. In this work, this approach was further improved and combined with absolute concentration measurements of aerosol surfactants by colorimetric titration. This analysis was applied to PM2.5 aerosols collected at the Baltic station of Asko, Sweden, from July to October 2010. Strong surfactants were found in all the sampled aerosols, with sigma = (32-40) +/- 1 mN m(-1) and concentrations of at least 27 +/- 6 mM or 104 +/- 21 pmol m(-3). The absolute surface tension curves and critical micelle concentrations (CMC) determined for these aerosol surfactants show that (1) surfactants are concentrated enough in atmospheric particles to strongly depress the surface tension until activation, and (2) the surface tension does not follow the Szyszkowski equation during activation but is nearly constant and minimal, which provides new insights on cloud droplet activation. In addition, both the CMCs determined and the correlation (R-2 similar to 0.7) between aerosol surfactant concentrations and chlorophyll-a seawater concentrations suggest a marine and biological origin for these compounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据