4.5 Article

Systematic profiling of ferroptosis gene signatures predicts prognostic factors in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

期刊

MOLECULAR THERAPY-ONCOLYTICS
卷 21, 期 -, 页码 134-143

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.omto.2021.02.011

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A predictive model associated with ferroptosis was developed to provide a comprehensive view of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) immunotherapy. The model identified 45 differentially expressed ferroptosis-related genes and established a prognostic model based on Cox regression analyses, with a predictive nomogram for overall survival. Low-risk patients showed a higher proportion of activated immune system genes and demonstrated the relevance of immune microenvironment for patient outcomes.
We developed a predictive model associated with ferroptosis to provide a more comprehensive view of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) immunotherapy. Gene expression data and corresponding clinical outcomes were obtained from the GEO and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases, and a ferroptosis-related gene set was obtained from the FerrDb database. We identified 45 ferroptosis-related genes that were differentially expressed, including enrichment in genes involved in the immune system process. We established a ferroptosis-related gene-based prognostic model based on the results of univariate Cox regression and multivariate Cox regression analyses, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.76 (3 years). We found that the patients with low-risk scores showed a higher proportion of CD8(+) T cells, CD4(+) memory activated T cells, etc. Finally, a predictive ferroptosis-related prognostic nomogram, which included the predictive values of age, gender, grade, TNM stage, and risk score, was established to predict overall survival. In sum, we developed a ferroptosis-related gene-based prognostic model that provides novel insights into the prediction of ESCC prognosis and identifies the relevance of the immune microenvironment for patient outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据