4.7 Article

An improved M-K model coupled with different ductile criteria for fracture limit predictions of Inconel 718 alloy

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.01.092

关键词

Fracture limits; Stretch forming; Fracture criteria; Improved M-K model; Inconel 718 alloy

资金

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board (SERBeDST ECR) Government of India [ECR/2016/001402]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focuses on accurately determining the forming limits of Inconel 718 alloy using an improved M-K model coupled with various ductile fracture criteria. The improved M-K model coupled with Oyane's fracture criterion shows good predictability of the fracture loci with the least average absolute errors and root-mean-square deviation.
Fracture Forming Limit Diagram (FFLD) is gaining special attention for high strength materials like Inconel 718 alloy where the substantial necking tendency rarely seen. The present study mainly aims at accurate evolution of forming limits for Inconel 718 alloy with an improved Marciniak-Kuczynski (M-K) model coupled and various ductile fracture criteria. Firstly, uniaxial test has been performed for analyzing material properties and anisotropic parameters. The stretch forming tests have been conducted to evaluate the limiting forming limits of Inconel 718 alloy. Subsequently, an improved M-K model coupled with ductile fracture criteria has been developed for the theoretical prediction of the fracture strains. The different ductile fracture criteria, namely; Clift, Cockcroft and Latham, Oyane and Brozzo, have been implemented in the improved M-K model. A Newton-Raphson method has been used to solve improved M-K model. The improved M-K model coupled with Oyane's fracture criterion has shown good predictability of the fracture loci with the least average absolute errors and root-mean-square deviation (Davg 1/4 0.075 and RMSD 1/4 0.105). (C) The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据