4.7 Article

Influence of scan paths on flow dynamics and weld formations during oscillating laser welding of 5A06 aluminum alloy

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.12.102

关键词

Oscillation laser welding; Scan paths; Numerical simulation; Flow dynamics; Porosity

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB1102100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundational of China [51675129]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China [GX17A001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cycloid scan path in laser welding of 5A06 aluminum alloys produces the largest molten pools with regular morphology and lowest temperature gradients, leading to reduction in porosity formation. Additionally, the shallow keyhole, low and highly homogeneous melt flow velocity, and complicated vortices contribute to this reduction.
Numerical simulations and experiments are conducted to investigate the influence of three different scan paths, namely straight, sine, and cycloid, on the flow dynamics and weld formation during the laser welding of 5A06 aluminum alloys. The cycloid scan path produced molten pools with the largest dimensions, most regular morphology, and lowest temperature gradients. And the shallowest keyhole with the highest stability and the lowest temperature is produced under this condition, which has the effect of reducing and homogenizing the distribution of the fluid velocity. The most complicated vortices are obtained when the cycloid scan path is used. Porosity ratios of 5.5, 4.9, and 0.59 are obtained when the scan paths are straight, sine, and cycloid, respectively. The large and stable molten pool, the shallow keyhole, as well as the low and highly homogeneous melt flow velocity and the complicated vortices, contribute to reduction in porosity formation. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据