Trends in predominant causes of death in individuals with and without diabetes in England from 2001 to 2018: an epidemiological analysis of linked primary care records
出版年份 2021 全文链接
标题
Trends in predominant causes of death in individuals with and without diabetes in England from 2001 to 2018: an epidemiological analysis of linked primary care records
作者
关键词
-
出版物
Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 165-173
出版商
Elsevier BV
发表日期
2021-02-06
DOI
10.1016/s2213-8587(20)30431-9
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Effect of dulaglutide on cognitive impairment in type 2 diabetes: an exploratory analysis of the REWIND trial
- (2020) Tali Cukierman-Yaffe et al. LANCET NEUROLOGY
- Unacceptable failures: the final report of the Lancet Commission into liver disease in the UK
- (2019) Roger Williams et al. LANCET
- Multimorbidity—a defining challenge for health systems
- (2019) Jonathan Pearson-Stuttard et al. Lancet Public Health
- Trends in cause-specific mortality among adults with and without diagnosed diabetes in the USA: an epidemiological analysis of linked national survey and vital statistics data
- (2018) Edward W Gregg et al. LANCET
- Type 2 diabetes in adolescents and young adults
- (2018) Nadia Lascar et al. Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
- Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults
- (2017) Leandra Abarca-Gómez et al. LANCET
- Associations Between Midlife Vascular Risk Factors and 25-Year Incident Dementia in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Cohort
- (2017) Rebecca F. Gottesman et al. JAMA Neurology
- Age-Specific Trends From 2000–2011 in All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: A Cohort Study of More Than One Million People
- (2016) Jessica L. Harding et al. DIABETES CARE
- Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4·4 million participants
- (2016) LANCET
- Data Resource Profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)
- (2015) Emily Herrett et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Contributions of risk factors and medical care to cardiovascular mortality trends
- (2015) Majid Ezzati et al. Nature Reviews Cardiology
- Changes in Diabetes-Related Complications in the United States, 1990–2010
- (2014) Edward W. Gregg et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Mortality trends in patients with and without diabetes in Ontario, Canada and the UK from 1996 to 2009: a population-based study
- (2013) M. Lind et al. DIABETOLOGIA
- Achievement of Goals in U.S. Diabetes Care, 1999–2010
- (2013) Mohammed K. Ali et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Midlife type 2 diabetes and poor glycaemic control as risk factors for cognitive decline in early old age: a post-hoc analysis of the Whitehall II cohort study
- (2013) Richard H Tuligenga et al. Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
- Associations of kidney disease measures with mortality and end-stage renal disease in individuals with and without diabetes: a meta-analysis
- (2012) Caroline S Fox et al. LANCET
- Miscoding, misclassification and misdiagnosis of diabetes in primary care
- (2011) S. de Lusignan et al. DIABETIC MEDICINE
- Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for coronary heart disease in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies
- (2011) Rachel R Huxley et al. LANCET
- Validity of diagnostic coding within the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review
- (2010) Nada F Khan et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
- Trends in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Individuals With and Without Diabetes Mellitus in the Framingham Heart Study
- (2009) Sarah Rosner Preis et al. CIRCULATION
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started