4.7 Article

Mercury bioaccumulation in an estuarine predator: Biotic factors, abiotic factors, and assessments of fish health

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 214, 期 -, 页码 169-176

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.007

关键词

Methylmercury; Trophic ecology; Longnose gar; Lepisosteus osseus

资金

  1. US Dept. of Energy through the Nuclear Workforce Initiative of the SRS Community Reuse Organization
  2. University of South Carolina Aiken Dept. of Biology and Geology
  3. Joanna Deep Water Fund Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estuarine wetlands are major contributors to mercury (Hg) transformation into its more toxic form, methylmercury (MeHg). Although these complex habitats are important, estuarine Hg bioaccumulation is not well understood. The longnose gar Lepisosteus osseus (L. 1758), an estuarine predator in the eastern United States, was selected to examine Hg processes due to its abundance, estuarine residence, and top predator status. This study examined variability in Hg concentrations within longnose gar muscle tissue spatially and temporally, the influence of biological factors, potential maternal transfer, and potential negative health effects on these fish. Smaller, immature fish had the highest Hg concentrations and were predominantly located in low salinity waters. Sex and diet were also important factors and Hg levels peaked in the spring. Although maternal transfer occurred in small amounts, the potential negative health effects to young gar remain unknown. Fish health as measured by fecundity and growth rate appeared to be relatively unaffected by Hg at concentrations in the present study (less than 1.3 ppm wet weight). The analysis of biotic and abiotic factors relative to tissue Hg concentrations in a single estuarine fish species provided valuable insight in Hg bioaccumulation, biomagnification, and elimination. Insights such as these can improve public health policy and environmental management decisions related to Hg pollution. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据