4.6 Article

Sustainable Residential Micro-Cogeneration System Based on a Fuel Cell Using Dynamic Programming-Based Economic Day-Ahead Scheduling

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 3258-3266

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c08725

关键词

fuel cell; sustainable cogeneration; dynamic programming; thermal energy storage; efficiency optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes an economic day-ahead scheduling strategy for sustainable cogeneration systems, optimizing heat and power flow patterns throughout the planning horizon. The incorporation of energy storage and TES results in efficiency improvements and healthier battery operations within the system.
Fuel cells are widely deemed as a sustainable cogeneration technology that promises great decarbonization potential. However, economic operations of such sustainable energy systems are challenging because of the coupling between the heat and power generation, as well as the imbalance between the production and consumption. To this end, this paper proposes an economic day-ahead scheduling strategy for a sustainable cogeneration system, consisting of fuel cell, battery, thermal energy storage (TES), and heat pump. Based on the component models, a dynamic programming framework is formulated, in which the optimization objective is minimizing the accumulative fuel consumption and the constraints are derived from safety requirements. Optimization based on a typical 24-h load profile results in an hourly heat and power flow pattern to exhibit a highly coordinated and complementary operation scenario within the whole planning horizon. The benefits of energy storage are fully exploited and the energy-saving potential of each component is explored. It is revealed that the incorporation of TES into the sustainable energy systems brings about 3.5% overall efficiency improvement and healthier battery operations. The effects of TES capacity on the efficiency of the sustainable energy systems are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据