4.6 Article

Synthesis and Characterization of Biobased Polyesters with Tunable Tg by ROCOP of Beta-Elemene Oxides and Phthalic Anhydride

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 2619-2625

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c09189

关键词

Beta-elemene; Biopolymers; Homogeneous catalysis; Polyesters; Ring opening copolymerization

资金

  1. MINECO [CTQ2017-88920-P]
  2. AGAUR [2017-SGR232]
  3. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [CEX2019-000925-S]
  4. European Community
  5. European Union [840557]
  6. Cerca program/Generalitat de Catalunya
  7. ICREA
  8. MINECO
  9. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [840557] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports the use of terpene-based oxides derived from beta-elemene in the development of new functional semiaromatic polyesters. By sequentially and selectively transforming double bonds through epoxidation, the degree and nature of functionality in the polymer backbone can be precisely manipulated. Furthermore, direct access to cross-linked polyesters with a higher Tg is demonstrated through ring-opening polymerization of bifunctional beta-elemene dioxide and phthalic anhydride.
The use of terpene-based oxides derived from beta-elemene is reported in the context of new functional semiaromatic polyester development. In particular, poly(beta-elemene monoxide-alt-phthalic anhydride) featuring two double bonds per repeating unit having distinct reactivity is conveniently prepared by iron- and aluminum-mediated ring-opening polymerization (ROCOP). Sequential and selective transformation of each of these double bonds is addressed by epoxidation allowing one to precisely manipulate the degree and nature of the functionality in the polymer backbone while modulating the T-g from 68 to 121 degrees C. Direct access to cross-linked polyesters is demonstrated by ROCOP of bifunctional beta-elemene dioxide and phthalic anhydride furnishing a material with a Tg of 125 degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据