4.7 Article

A Robust Composite Proton Exchange Membrane of Sulfonated Poly (Fluorenyl Ether Ketone) with an Electrospun Polyimide Mat for Direct Methanol Fuel Cells Application

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13040523

关键词

electrospun mat; proton exchange membrane; direct methanol fuel cell; composite membrane

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program (JapanChina Joint Research Program) [2017YFE0197900]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1601211]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program [2018YFA0702002]
  4. Guangdong Province [U1601211]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focused on a novel SPFEK composite membrane with excellent mechanical properties and antioxidant stability in a hydrated state, suitable for direct methanol fuel cells. The performance of the composite membrane was thoroughly evaluated, demonstrating its potential applications in fuel cell technology.
As a key component of direct methanol fuel cells, proton exchange membranes with suitable thickness and robust mechanical properties have attracted increasing attention. On the one hand, a thinner membrane gives a lower internal resistance, which contributes highly to the overall electrochemical performance of the cell, on the other hand, strong mechanical strength is required for the application of proton exchange membranes. In this work, a sulfonated poly (fluorenyl ether ketone) (SPFEK)-impregnated polyimide nanofiber mat composite membrane (PI@SPFEK) was fabricated. The new composite membrane with a thickness of about 55 mu m exhibited a tensile strength of 35.1 MPa in a hydrated state, which is about 65.8% higher than that of the pristine SPFEK membrane. The antioxidant stability test in Fenton's reagent shows that the reinforced membrane affords better oxidation stability than does the pristine SPFEK membrane. Furthermore, the morphology, proton conductivity, methanol permeability, and fuel cell performance were carefully evaluated and discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据