4.7 Article

Residue patterns of currently, historically and never-used organochlorine pesticides in agricultural soils across China and associated health risks

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 219, 期 -, 页码 315-322

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.060

关键词

Endosulfan; Chlordane; Drin; Agricultural soils; Health risk

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21427815, 21607128, 21320102007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) with different usage states, such as currently, historically or never used, may show different behaviors and potential risks in the environment. It is essential to identify their distribution patterns and fates and to assess their associated health risks to humans. In this study, based on a nationwide sampling campaign across China, we determined the concentrations of currently (endosulfan), historically (chlordane and heptachlor) and never-used (aldrin, dieldrin and endrin) OCPs in agricultural soils. The total residue inventories of Sigma Endosulfans, Sigma Chlordanes, heptachlor and Sigma Drins in soils were 260, 64.3, 54.2 and 88.6 t, respectively: The residues of endosulfan were influenced by current usage, showing a latitude transect trend. Drins were mainly from long-range transport, but the illegal usage in China still affected their residues. This finding indicates that endosulfan and drins in Chinese agricultural soils mainly follow the primary and secondary distribution pattern, respectively. Both primary and secondary distribution have a great impact on the distribution pattern of chlordane, which had been banned for only 4 years at the time we sampled. The health risks of these OCPs were estimated based on their concentrations. There were 0.813% and 1.63% of samples that exceeded the target values for chlordane and endrin according to the Netherlands guideline for unpolluted soil. Their residues in most of the samples posed no or few non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks to human beings. The results from this study will provide powerful support for pollution control and management. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据