4.7 Article

Blood pressure variability is related to faster cognitive decline in ischemic stroke patients: PICASSO subanalysis

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83945-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Korea Otsuka Pharmaceutical Company

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that higher blood pressure variability is associated with faster declines in cognitive function in ischemic stroke patients, independently of mean systolic blood pressure. Further research is needed to elucidate the impact of BPV on cognitive function.
Blood pressure variability (BPV) is associated with higher cardiovascular morbidity risks; however, its association with cognitive decline remains unclear. We investigated whether higher BPV is associated with faster declines in cognitive function in ischemic stroke (IS) patients. Cognitive function was evaluated between April 2010 and August 2015 using the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in 1,240 Korean PICASSO participants. Patients for whom baseline and follow-up cognitive test results and at least five valid BP readings were available were included. A restricted maximum likelihood-based Mixed Model for Repeated Measures was used to compare changes in cognitive function over time. Among a total of 746 participants (64.6 +/- 10.8 years; 35.9% female). Baseline mean-MMSE score was 24.9 +/- 4.7. The median number of BP readings was 11. During a mean follow-up of 2.6 years, mean baseline and last follow-up MMSE scores were 25.4 +/- 4.8 vs. 27.8 +/- 4.4 (the lowest BPV group) and 23.9 +/- 5.2 vs. 23.2 +/- 5.9 (the highest BPV group). After adjusting for multiple variables, higher BPV was independently associated with faster cognitive decline over time. However, no significant intergroup difference in cognitive changes associated with mean systolic BP was observed. Further research is needed to elucidate how BPV might affect cognitive function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据