4.6 Article

Effects of segregation in binary granular mixture avalanches down inclined chutes impinging on defending structures

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES
卷 75, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-015-5076-1

关键词

Granular avalanches; Discrete element method; Segregation; Retaining wall; Impact force

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2013CB733201]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41272346, 41472293, 41202258, 91430105]
  3. Sci&Tec Research Project from the Second Railways Survey and Design Institute of the China Ministry of Railway [13164196(13-15)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the segregation processes and impact response of binary granular mixtures with identical densities but different sizes particles subjected to gravity. Deposition was compared using discrete element method (DEM) numerical experiment and laboratory experiment to determine the material parameters in the particle flow code in three dimensions (PFC3D). With proper material parameters, many numerical experiments were performed on an idealized binary granular mixture avalanche to reveal its kinetic properties, with a particular focus on the results of the final run-out distance, fluid velocity, and impact force exerted on defending structures. The simulation results show that the energy dissipation in granular avalanches is higher with uniform particle sizes than with mixed particle sizes, indicating lesser energy dissipation in segregation processes. Coarse particles also play an important role in determining the kinetic properties of binary granular mixture avalanches; specifically, they obviously affect the maximum impact force when the storage area length is small. On the other hand, fine particles play an important role when the storage area length is large. These results suggest that the effects of coarse particles in granular avalanches containing more than one particle size may be at least as important.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据