4.5 Article

Actionable Principles for Artificial Intelligence Policy: Three Pathways

期刊

SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-020-00277-3

关键词

Artificial intelligence policy; Actionable principles; Ethics; Ethics of artificial intelligence; Governance of artificial intelligence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a novel framework for the development of 'Actionable Principles for AI', drawing on elements from the development process of the European Commission's High Level Expert Group on AI's Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. The paper suggests three propositions for the formation of a prototype framework, including preliminary landscape assessments, multi-stakeholder participation and cross-sectoral feedback, and mechanisms to support implementation and operationalizability.
In the development of governmental policy for artificial intelligence (AI) that is informed by ethics, one avenue currently pursued is that of drawing on AI Ethics Principles. However, these AI Ethics Principles often fail to be actioned in governmental policy. This paper proposes a novel framework for the development of 'Actionable Principles for AI'. The approach acknowledges the relevance of AI Ethics Principles and homes in on methodological elements to increase their practical implementability in policy processes. As a case study, elements are extracted from the development process of the Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI of the European Commission's High Level Expert Group on AI. Subsequently, these elements are expanded on and evaluated in light of their ability to contribute to a prototype framework for the development of 'Actionable Principles for AI'. The paper proposes the following three propositions for the formation of such a prototype framework: (1) preliminary landscape assessments; (2) multi-stakeholder participation and cross-sectoral feedback; and, (3) mechanisms to support implementation and operationalizability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据