4.7 Article

Changes in carbohydrates triggered by low temperature waterlogging modify photosynthetic acclimation to cold in Festuca pratensis

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 122, 期 -, 页码 60-67

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.09.003

关键词

Chlorophyll fluorescence; Low temperature waterlogging; Rubisco activase; Rubisco activity; Water-soluble carbohydrates

资金

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [4138]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increased precipitation expected during autumn and winter at higher latitudes in the northern hemisphere may lead to low temperature short-term waterlogging. The temperature of waterlogging was shown to be an important factor controlling plant reaction to this stress. Photosynthetic apparatus response to water excess in the soil at low temperature was examined in Festuca pratensis genotypes with contrasting freezing tolerance. The study, was aimed to test the hypothesis whether changes in leaf water-soluble carbohydrate concentration brought about alterations in Rubisco activity may affect the photoacclimation to cold under water excess in the soil. The study investigated the effects of waterlogging during cold acclimation process on a set of chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters, water-soluble carbohydrates, expression of Rubisco activase gene, and Rubisco activity. It was shown that carbohydrate status affected by Rubisco activity might be crucial for the activation of non-photochemical mechanism of photoacclimation to cold under waterlogging. Altered Rubisco activity was only partially attributed to the expression of Rubisco activase gene. Additionally, low carbohydrate concentration in the leaves of waterlogged plants was the condition preventing sugar repression of photosynthesis, including RcaA expression. This indicates that sugar de-repression of photosynthetic genes may be considered a component of photosynthetic acclimation to cold under waterlogging. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据