4.6 Article

Lipopeptide and zinc oxide nanoparticles blended polyvinyl alcohol-based nanocomposite films as antimicrobial coating for biomedical applications

期刊

PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 102, 期 -, 页码 220-228

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2020.12.010

关键词

Antimicrobial coating; Polyvinyl alcohol; Lipopeptides; Zinc oxide nanoparticles; Biomedical application

资金

  1. King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Thailand [KMUTNB-64-KNOW-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study developed PVA-based antimicrobial membranes with lipopeptides (LPs) and zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs) using solvent casting method. The engineered membranes showed enhanced optical, thermal, mechanical, and water barrier properties, and excellent activity against biofilm-forming bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The nanocomposite membranes were also found to be hemocompatible with improved dressing pH features, suggesting promising biomedical applications as antimicrobial coatings.
Infections caused by the biofilm-forming multi-drug resistant organisms are increasing day by day. In this study, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) based antimicrobial membranes were developed with the incorporation of lipopeptides (LPs) and zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs) by solvent casting method. The fabricated membranes were further characterised by the FT-IR, SEM, UV-vis spectroscopy, TGA and mechanical analysis. The results showed enhanced optical, thermal, mechanical and water barrier properties for the membranes engineered with LPs and ZnONPs. The membranes also showed excellent activity against the biofilm-forming bacteria such as the Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Also, the developed nanocomposite membranes were found to be hemocompatible with enhanced dressing pH features. Hence, the developed nanocomposite membranes can be considered to have promising biomedical application as antimicrobial coating.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据