4.6 Article

Soil particle size range correction for improved calibration relationship between the laser-diffraction method and sieve-pipette method

期刊

PEDOSPHERE
卷 31, 期 1, 页码 134-144

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S1002-0160(20)60055-8

关键词

laser diffraction; Lin's concordance correlation coefficient; particle size distribution; Pearson's correlation coefficient; sedimentation method; soil separate; soil texture

资金

  1. Plant & Food Research-led Strategic Science Investment Fund Program
  2. New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [P/442062/01, P/443063/01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Particle size fraction is an important soil characteristic that impacts various soil functions. The study compared the laser-diffraction method (LDM) with the traditional sieve-pipette method (SPM) in determining particle size distribution, finding discrepancies in estimating clay and silt fractions. New calibration models based on corrected size ranges improved the accuracy of LDM in estimating clay and silt contents, suggesting a universal model may be more efficient for assessing particle size fractions across different soil types.
Particle size fraction (clay, silt, and sand) is an important characteristic that influences several soil functions. The laser-diffraction method (LDM) provides a fast and cost-effective measurement of particle size distribution, but the results usually differ from those obtained by the traditional sieve-pipette method (SPM). This difference can persist even when calibration is applied between the two methods. This partly relates to the different size ranges of particles measured by the two methods as a result of different operational principles, i.e., particle sedimentation according to Stokes' Law vs. Mie theory for laser beam scattering. The objective of this study was to identify particle size ranges of LDM equivalent to those measured by SPM and evaluate whether new calibration models based on size range correction can be used to improve LDM-estimated particle size fractions, using 51 soil samples with various texture collected from five soil orders in New Zealand. Particle size distribution was determined using both LDM and SPM. Compared with SPM, original data from LDM underestimated the clay fraction (< 2 mu m), overestimated the silt fraction (2-53 mu m), but provided a good estimation of the sand fraction (53-2 000 mu m). Results from three statistical indices, including Pearson's correlation coefficient, slope, and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, showed that the size ranges of < 2 and 2-53 mu m defined by SPM corresponded with the < 5 and 5-53 mu m size ranges by LDM, respectively. Compared with the traditional calibration (based on the same particle size ranges), new calibration models (based on the corrected size ranges of these two methods) improved the estimation of clay and silt contents by LDM. Compared with soil-specific models (i.e., different models were developed for different soils), a universal model may be more parsimonious for estimating particle size fractions if the samples to be assessed represent multiple soil orders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据