4.6 Article

Cross-subject transfer learning in human activity recognition systems using generative adversarial networks

期刊

NEUROCOMPUTING
卷 426, 期 -, 页码 26-34

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.10.056

关键词

Transfer learning; Generative adversarial network; Human activity recognition; Cross-subject transfer learning; Learning with small samples

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Application of intelligent systems in smart homes and health-related topics has gained more attention. The proposed method SA-GAN for transfer learning in Human Activity Recognition outperformed other state-of-the-art methods in most experiments.
Application of intelligent systems especially in smart homes and health-related topics has been drawing more attention in the last decades. Training Human Activity Recognition (HAR) models - as a major module- requires a fair amount of labeled data. Despite training with large datasets, most of the existing models will face a dramatic performance drop when they are tested against unseen data from new users. Moreover, recording enough data for each new user is non-viable due to the limitations and challenges of working with human users. Transfer learning techniques aim to transfer the knowledge which has been learned from the source domain (subject) to the target domain in order to decrease the models' performance loss in the target domain. This paper presents a novel method of adversarial knowledge transfer named SA-GAN stands for Subject Adaptor GAN, which utilizes the Generative Adversarial Network framework to perform cross-subject transfer learning in the domain of wearable sensor-based Human Activity Recognition. SA-GAN outperformed other state-of-the-art methods in more than 66% of experiments and showed the second-best performance in the remaining 25% of experiments. In some cases, it reached up to 90% of the accuracy which can be obtained by supervised training over the same domain data. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据