4.8 Article

Quantum approximate optimization of non-planar graph problems on a planar superconducting processor

期刊

NATURE PHYSICS
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 332-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41567-020-01105-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [828826]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research demonstrates the application of Google Sycamore superconducting qubit quantum processor to combinatorial optimization problems. Performance depends on problem type and circuit depth, with subpar results for non-native problems, suggesting a need for more focus.
Faster algorithms for combinatorial optimization could prove transformative for diverse areas such as logistics, finance and machine learning. Accordingly, the possibility of quantum enhanced optimization has driven much interest in quantum technologies. Here we demonstrate the application of the Google Sycamore superconducting qubit quantum processor to combinatorial optimization problems with the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA). Like past QAOA experiments, we study performance for problems defined on the planar connectivity graph native to our hardware; however, we also apply the QAOA to the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model and MaxCut, non-native problems that require extensive compilation to implement. For hardware-native problems, which are classically efficient to solve on average, we obtain an approximation ratio that is independent of problem size and observe that performance increases with circuit depth. For problems requiring compilation, performance decreases with problem size. Circuits involving several thousand gates still present an advantage over random guessing but not over some efficient classical algorithms. Our results suggest that it will be challenging to scale near-term implementations of the QAOA for problems on non-native graphs. As these graphs are closer to real-world instances, we suggest more emphasis should be placed on such problems when using the QAOA to benchmark quantum processors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据