4.6 Article

Fucoidan-based micelles as P-selectin targeted carriers for synergistic treatment of acute kidney injury

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2020.102342

关键词

Acute kidney injury; Fucoidan; Curcumin; P-selectin targeting ability; Synergetic therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study developed kidney-targeted OSA-Fucoidan/Cur micelles with sustained drug release behavior and excellent physicochemical stability. Cellular uptake studies demonstrated the specific binding between fucoidan and P-selectin, leading to higher internalization of the micelles, which exhibited ideal kidney-targeted characteristics. In vivo studies showed that the micelles possessed anti-inflammatory and antioxidant abilities, enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of AKI.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a life-threatening disease without effective treatment. The utilization of curcumin (Cur) for the treatment of AKI is still facing challenges due to its poor water-solubility and low bioavailability. Herein, kidney-targeted octenyl succinic anhydride-grafted fucoidan loaded with Cur (OSA-Fucoidan/Cur) was fabricated for synergistic treatment of AKI. It was found that OSA-Fucoidan/Cur micelles had a sustained drug release behavior and excellent physicochemical stability. Cellular uptake studies demonstrated that the specific binding between fucoidan and P-selectin overexpressed on H2O2-stimulated HUVECs contributed to the higher internalization of OSA-Fucoidan/Cur micelles by the cells. In addition, OSA-Fucoidan micelles exhibited an ideal kidney-targeted characteristic in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced AM mice. In vivo studies showed that the combination of Cur and OSA-Fucoidan endowed the OSA-Fucoidan/Cur micelles with synergistically anti-inflammatory and antioxidant abilities, thereby largely enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of AKI. Therefore, OSA-Fucoidan/Cur micelles may represent a potential kidney-targeted nanomedicine for effective treatment of AM. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据