4.8 Article

Spin-Wave Emission from Vortex Cores under Static Magnetic Bias Fields

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 1584-1590

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03740

关键词

magnetization dynamics; magnonics; X-ray microscopy; spin waves; vortex cores

资金

  1. German Ministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) [05K16WED, 05K19WE2]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [172517]
  3. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant [794207]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of a static in-plane magnetic field on the emission of nanoscale spin waves from magnetic vortex cores is studied in disk structures of synthetic ferrimagnets and single ferromagnetic layers. Increasing magnetic bias field displaces the wave-emitting vortex core from the center of the disk toward its edge without altering the spin-wave dispersion relation noticeably. At higher magnetic fields, anisotropic lateral expansion of the core occurs in single-layer disks leading to directional emission and propagation of waves.
We studied the influence of a static in-plane magnetic field on the alternating-field-driven emission of nanoscale spin waves from magnetic vortex cores. Time-resolved scanning transmission X-ray microscopy was used to image spin waves in disk structures of synthetic ferrimagnets and single ferromagnetic layers. For both systems, it was found that an increasing magnetic bias field continuously displaces the wave-emitting vortex core from the center of the disk toward its edge without noticeably altering the spin-wave dispersion relation. In the case of the single-layer disk, an anisotropic lateral expansion of the core occurs at higher magnetic fields, which leads to a directional rather than radial-isotropic emission and propagation of waves. Micromagnetic simulations confirm these findings and further show that focusing effects occur in such systems, depending on the shape of the core and controlled by the static magnetic bias field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据