4.8 Review

A review on the stability and surface modification of layered transition-metal oxide cathodes

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY
卷 46, 期 -, 页码 155-182

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mattod.2020.12.017

关键词

Lithium-ion batteries; Cathodes; Layered transition-metal oxides; Stability; Surface modification

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) through the Advanced Battery Materials Research (BMR) program [DE-AC05-76RL01830]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The increasing demand for high energy density batteries and stable electrochemical performance has drawn attention to the promising candidates of layered transition metal oxides, facing challenges in stability. Various surface modification strategies have been pursued to enhance the stability of these cathode materials.
An ever-increasing market for electric vehicles (EVs), electronic devices and others has brought tremendous attention on the need for high energy density batteries with reliable electrochemical performances. However, even the successfully commercialized lithium (Li)-ion batteries still face significant challenges with respect to cost and safety issues when they are used in EVs. From a cathode material point of view, layered transition-metal (TM) oxides, represented by LiMO2 (M = Ni, Mn, Co, Al, etc.) and Li-/Mn-rich xLi2MnO3 center dot(1-x)LiMO2, have been considered as promising candidates because of their high theoretical capacity, high operating voltage, and low manufacturing cost. However, layered TM oxides still have not reached their full potential for EV applications due to their intrinsic stability issues during electrochemical processes. To address these problems, a variety of surface modification strategies have been pursued in the literature. Herein, we summarize the recent progresses on the enhanced stability of layered TM oxides cathode materials by different surface modification techniques, analyze the manufacturing process and cost of the surface modification methods, and finally propose future research directions in this area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据