4.7 Article

Optimal calibration of the rotational inertia double tuned mass damper (RIDTMD) for rotating wind turbine blades

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION
卷 493, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115827

关键词

Inerter; Novel vibration absorber; Wind turbine; Blade vibration; Optimal calibration; Closed-form formulas

资金

  1. Aarhus University Research Foundation [AUFF-E-2017-7-20]
  2. Committee of Science and Technology of Shanghai China [18160712800]
  3. State's Key Project of Research and Development Plan [2016YFE0127900]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51908209]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents closed-form formulas for optimal calibration of the rotational inertia double tuned mass damper (RIDTMD) for damping edgewise vibrations in rotating wind turbine blades, by establishing a 3-DOF model and using the pole-placement method. The results show that RIDTMD performs better than TMD in damping blade vibrations, but with a slightly increased damper stroke.
This paper presents the closed-form formulas for optimal calibration (tuning) of the rotational inertia double tuned mass damper (RIDTMD) for damping edgewise vibrations in rotating wind turbine blades. A 3-DOF model is first established for the rotating blade-RIDTMD system, based on which the optimal calibration formulas are derived by means of pole-placement method. Equal modal damping criterion is applied together with the utilization of the triple-root bifurcation point. It is seen from the derived closed-form formulas that the optimal damper parameters depend explicitly on the rotor rotational speed. Comparison of the optimal RIDTMD and the optimal TMD is performed using the NREL 5 MW wind turbine as the numerical example. Results indicate superior performance of the RIDTMD in damping blade vibrations comparing with the TMD, at the cost of slightly increased damper stroke. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据