4.5 Article

High-Temperature Scanning Indentation: A new method to investigate in situ metallurgical evolution along temperature ramps

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH
卷 36, 期 12, 页码 2383-2396

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1557/s43578-021-00107-7

关键词

Nanoindentation; Annealing; Microstructure

资金

  1. CPER MANUTECH
  2. French National Research Agency (ANR) [ANR-20-CE08-0022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The new technique HTSI utilizes high-speed nanohardness measurements to investigate metallurgical evolution during anisothermal heat treatments, allowing for quasi-continuous measurements of elastic modulus and hardness in a much shorter time frame. It has been validated on fused silica and pure aluminum, and applied to study thermally activated mechanisms in cold-rolled aluminum materials.
A new technique, High-Temperature Scanning Indentation (HTSI), is proposed to investigate metallurgical evolution occurring during anisothermal heat treatments. This technique is based on the use of high-speed nanohardness measurements carried out during linear thermal ramping of the system with appropriate settings. A specific high-speed loading procedure, based on a quarter sinus loading function, a creep segment and a three-step unloading method, permits the measurement of elastic, plastic and creep properties. The indentation cycle lasts one second to minimize thermal drift issues. This approach enables quasi-continuous measurements of elastic modulus and hardness as a function of temperature in much shorter times than previous techniques. The HTSI technique is validated on fused silica and pure aluminum. The application to cold-rolled aluminum undergoing thermal cycling highlights the potential of the HTSI technique to investigate in situ thermally activated mechanisms linked with microstructural changes such as viscoplasticity, static recovery and recrystallization mechanisms in metals. Results on aluminum were confirmed using Electron Back-Scattering Diffraction measurements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据