4.7 Article

Controllable synthesis of porous silver cyanamide nanocrystals with tunable morphologies for selective photocatalytic CO2 reduction into CH4

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 593, 期 -, 页码 152-161

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.02.087

关键词

Silver cyanamide; CO2 reduction; Porous structure; Band gap; Photocatalysis

资金

  1. Xiangtan University [06KZ/KZ08082]
  2. Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province [2020RC2076]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A porous silver cyanamide nanocrystals photocatalyst was prepared for converting CO2 to CH4, showing increased catalytic activity and selectivity by providing more internal reaction microenvironment and expanding active sites.
The conversion of CO2 driven by solar energy into carbon-containing fuel has huge potential applications. However, most photocatalysts can only promote the two-electron reduction process to generate CO, and it is difficult to produce eight-electron CH4, which is more valuable and can store more solar energy. Herein, we prepared porous silver cyanamide nanocrystals with tunable morphologies via a facile synthesis strategy. Compared with ball/rectangular plate (RAP) and ball/leaf-like plate (SAP), the ball/porous leaf-like plate (LAP) can provide more internal reaction microenvironment, which is not only conducive to the transport of photoinduced charge carriers, but also can expand the active sites for photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Moreover, the suitable band gap of LAP sample can capture more visible light to provide more photoinduced electron-hole pairs to participate in the reduction reaction. Consequently, the LAP sample can convert CO2 to CH4 with remarkable activity and high selectivity (nearly 100%) without cocatalyst and photosensitizer under visible light irradiation. This work provides a promising way to design new photocatalysts for various applications in solar energy conversion. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据