4.7 Article

Atomic Fe & FeP nanoparticles synergistically facilitate oxygen reduction reaction of hollow carbon hybrids

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 583, 期 -, 页码 371-375

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.09.048

关键词

Single atom; Iron phosphide nanoparticles; Synergistic catalysis; Hollow carbon; Oxygen reduction reaction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21675147, 21802003, 21974097]
  2. Jilin Provincial Science and Technology Development Program [20190201242JC]
  3. Science and Technology Bureau of Jiangmen [2019030102360012639]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully synthesized FeP@SA-Fe/HC-900 hybrid catalyst with high oxygen reduction reaction activity, showing superior performance compared to commercial Pt/C catalyst. The research provides a new approach to enhance the electrochemical catalytic performance of carbon composite materials through the synergistic effect of atomic-metal and metal nanoparticles.
Exploring highly active non-noble metal oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalysts and understanding the mechanism are very essential for future energy conversion and storage devices. Herein, we provide a novel method to produce FeP nanoparticles and single atom Fe co-doped porous hollow carbon hybrids (FeP@SA-Fe/HC) from iron metal-organic framework (NH2-MIL(Fe)), phytic acid and melamine. Interestingly, thanks for the co-existence of the atomic Fe and FeP nanoparticles, porous hollow microstructure, and heteroatom doping, the obtained FeP@SA-Fe/HC-900 hybrid shows very high ORR activity with a more positive half-wave potential of 0.843 V (vs. reversible hydrogen electrode) in 0.10 M KOH, comparing with the commercial 20 wt% Pt/C catalyst (0.807 V). Our methodology puts forwards a new sight to enhance the electrochemical catalytic performance of carbon composite materials through the synergistic effect of the atomic-metal and metal nanoparticles. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据