4.8 Article

Type II cuprous oxide/graphitic carbon nitride p-n heterojunctions for enhanced photocatalytic nitrogen fixation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 395, 期 -, 页码 273-281

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2021.01.013

关键词

Graphitic carbon nitride; Cu2O; p-n heterojunction; Photocatalytic nitrogen fixation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51872162, 11890700]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2018MEM013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combination of p-type Cu2O with n-type CN to create p-n heterojunction photocatalysts improves nitrogen reduction performance and cyclic stability, with higher quantum efficiency and NH3 production activity. An in-depth exploration of the energy band structure of the photocatalyst rationalizes the enhanced photocatalytic fixation performance in the p-n system, guiding the future design of improved nitrogen reduction photocatalysts.
Graphitic carbon nitride (CN) is a metal-free polymeric n-type semiconductor and a promising photocat-alyst for dinitrogen fixation. However, modest solar spectrum utilization and poor charge separation limit its photocatalytic performance. Herein, we combined p-type Cu2O with n-type CN to create novel p-n heterojunction photocatalysts, which demonstrated greatly improved nitrogen reduction performance relative to pristine CN or Cu2O, and also excellent cyclic stability. The quantum efficiency of the compo-sitionally optimized 0.6Cu(2)O/CN photocatalyst was 0.57%, which was approximately 5 times higher than that of Cu2O (0.1%). A NH3 production rate of 10 lmol h(-1) was realized under visible light. The NH3 production activity remained high over 20 h of continuous testing. An in-depth exploration of the energy band structure of the photocatalyst allowed rationalization of the enhanced photocatalytic fixation performance in the p-n system, which guides the future design of improved nitrogen reduction photocatalysts. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据