4.1 Article

Consistency in the life history traits of four invasive pseudorasbora parva populations in Southern England

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ICHTHYOLOGY
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 295-302

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1111/jai.14175

关键词

gonado‐ somatic index; invasion; non‐ native; life history

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found high consistency in the life-history traits of four P. parva populations in adjacent ponds, with similar relative abundances and low variability in traits related to reproductive effort and somatic growth. All populations were male dominated, with both sexes maturing at small body sizes.
Life history plasticity can be a strong predictor of the establishment and invasion success of introduced fishes. Here, the life-history traits of four P. parva populations in adjacent ponds in Southern England were measured throughout 2013 to determine the timing and length of their reproductive season and the extent of trait plasticity. The relative abundance of the populations (as catch per unit effort) was similar, with low variability in their traits relating to reproductive effort and somatic growth. All the populations were male dominated. Both sexes matured at small body sizes, with fish as small as 30 mm being mature in both sexes, with the age at maturity for both sexes being age 1+ years. The peak spawning period, characterised by female fish investing heavily in reproduction when their gonado-somatic index (GSI) values were highest and declined thereafter, occurred in May and June, and after a mean of 212 +/- 24 degree-days >12 degrees C, and with water temperatures being 13.2-14.6 degrees C. There were no further peaks in GSI, despite the species being considered to have prolonged spawning periods across spring and summer. These results also suggest that whilst the expression of life-history traits of invasive fishes often vary with density, they can be highly consistent between populations at similar abundances and locations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据