4.7 Article

A dislocation-based flow rule with succinct power-law form suitable for crystal plasticity finite element simulations

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY
卷 138, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102921

关键词

Dislocations; Thermal activation; Power law; Strain rate sensitivity; fcc metals; CPFEM

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1764252]
  2. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFA0209900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a new dislocation bow-out model to interpret the strain rate sensitivity of fcc metals without using empirical terms. The research results indicate that strain rate sensitivity depends on the ratio of obstacle strength to zero-stress activation energy, and the values obtained match well with experimental data.
The physical interpretation of the power-law flow rule from the classic Kocks model suggests that strain rate sensitivity is determined by an empirical parameter that differs from the zero-stress activation energy. This paper proposes a dislocation bow-out model that seeks to further interpret the physical significance of strain rate sensitivity of face-centered cubic (fcc) metals without involving empirical terms. Interestingly, strain rate sensitivity is found to rely on the ratio of the obstacle strength to the zero-stress activation energy. The values of strain rate sensitivity obtained from our calculations match well with the experimental data for pure fcc metals. The resulting flow rule maintains a mathematically concise power-law form with parameters having clear physical meanings and sufficient accuracy. The concise power-law form of the present model enables its easy implementation in the crystal plasticity finite element method and offers flexibility to simulate stress-strain curves of fcc metals deformed at a wide range of temperatures and strain rates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据