4.7 Review

A review of g-C3N4 based catalysts for direct methanol fuel cells

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 47, 期 5, 页码 3371-3395

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.080

关键词

Direct methanol fuel cells; g-C3N4 catalysts; Carbon based electrocatalysts

资金

  1. Qatar University [QUCG-CENG-19/20-7]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes the performance of electrocatalysts based on two-dimensional graphitic carbon nitride in methanol oxidation reactions. It describes the structure, synthesis methods, and post-synthesis treatments of g-C3N4, and evaluates their performance. Finally, the review discusses the challenges and possible solutions for the future development of DMFC.
Direct methanol fuel cells (DMFC) possess numerous advantages for powering portable mobile devices. However, there are still major challenges in their development and commercialization that originates from the anode catalyst responsible for methanol oxidation reaction. This has motivated researchers to find a cost effective and durable catalyst material for methanol oxidation. Recently, carbon-based 2-D graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) has been found to have good potentials to catalyse alcohol oxidation reactions in fuel cells. This review provides a summarized information of previously developed g-C3N4-containing-electrocatalysts based on the active sites present (e.g., non-metals, noble metals, and non-noble metals) for methanol electro-oxidation to compare their electrocatalytic performance. It also consists of brief examination of their structure, description of different synthesis methods and post-synthesis treatments, and evaluation of their properties that contributes to their resulting performance. The review then concludes with the details of challenges and possible solutions that enable DMFC to be a reliable source of energy in the future. (C) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据