4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

CuFe electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction in alkaline electrolysis

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 46, 期 72, 页码 35886-35895

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.227

关键词

Hydrogen evolution reaction; Electrolysis; Electrochemical water splitting; Catalyst; CuFe layered double hydroxide; Electrocatalyst

资金

  1. Ministry of Science & Technology Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a CuFe layered double hydroxide (LDH) electrocatalyst was synthesized on nickel foam via a facile hydrothermal method, demonstrating significant electrocatalytic activity for HER in alkaline electrolysis. The overpotential of CuFe LDH was lower compared to NiFe LDH and NiRu LDH, possibly due to higher proton adsorption by Cu. These results suggest that CuFe LDH could be a promising candidate for developing low cost and efficient hydroxide catalysts.
The development of high performance, stable catalyst with non-precious metals for electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction for alkaline electrolysis is in demand. Here-in, we report the synthesis of CuFe layered double hydroxide (LDH) electrocatalyst on nickel foam via facile hydrothermal method. In alkaline electrolysis with 1 M NaOH electrolyte, CuFe LDH as cathode requires an overpotential of 159 mV to generate current density of 10 mA cm(-2). Which is ca. 51 mV and 7 mV lower than NiFe LDH and NiRu LDH. CuFe LDH exhibits significant electrocatalytic activity for HER. The higher catalytic activity of CuFe LDH compared to NiFe LDH may be achieved with higher proton adsorption by Cu compared to Ni. Also, the efficient charge transfer with interconnected LDH layers, favourable three dimensional structure facilitating easy electrolyte transfer to the active sites and hydrogen gas diffusion. This work may help in developing low cost and efficient hydroxide catalyst. (C) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据