4.7 Review

Polysaccharides and proteins-based nanogenerator for energy harvesting and sensing: A review

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.01.109

关键词

Natural polymer; Piezoelectric nanogenerator; Triboelectric nanogenerator; Wearable device; Implantable device; Self-powered sensor

资金

  1. Seed Foundation of Tianjin University [2020XT-0051]
  2. Excellent Young Scientists Fund by National Natural Science Foundation of China [31722022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanogenerators are promising energy harvesting devices that utilize natural bio-polymers for their excellent characteristics like piezoelectricity and biocompatibility. Challenges in improving electric output performance, flexibility, anti-humidity, and energy management need to be addressed for wider applications in daily life as an alternative power source.
Nanogenerator is a promising energy harvesting device that can scavenge tiny mechanical energy from the surrounding environment, and then convert it into electricity. Natural bio-polymers are the potential candidates for the design of nanogenerators due to their excellent characteristics like piezoelectricity, triboelectricity, non-toxicity, biocompatibility and biodegradability. Especially, nanogenerators using bio-sourced polymers as the core raw materials are suitable for wearable and implantable devices. In this review, major advancements in the sensing field of nanogenerators based on natural polysaccharides and proteins (cellulose, chitosan, alginate, agarose, starch, lignin, silk fibroin, collagen, gelatin, keratin, peptide, M13 bacteriophage, beta-cyclodextrin, spider silk, etc.) are summarized. Also, challenges in the improvement of electric output performance, flexibility, anti-humidity and energy management for natural polymers based-nanogenerators are proposed. In the future, they will be applied in daily life as an alternative for traditional power source after addressing issues-mentioned above. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据