4.6 Review

The challenges, approaches, and used techniques of CPS for manufacturing in Industry 4.0: a literature review

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-06572-4

关键词

Industry 4; 0; Cyber-physical systems (CPS); Internet of Things (IoT); Internet of Services (IoS); Manufacturing industry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reviewed literature on CPS for manufacturing in industry 4.0 from 2010 to 2019, analyzed 78 prospective studies, and identified challenges, approaches, and techniques as key enablers. Standardization of components and interfaces, including human, cyber, and physical components, is crucial for the success of Industry 4.0.
This work aims to review literature related to the latest cyber-physical systems (CPS) for manufacturing in the revolutionary Industry 4.0 for a comprehensive understanding of the challenges, approaches, and used techniques in this domain. Different published studies on CPS for manufacturing in Industry 4.0 paradigms through 2010 to 2019 were searched and summarized. We, then, analyzed the studies at a different granularity level inspecting the title, abstract, and full text to include in the prospective study list. Out of 626 primarily extracted relevant articles, we scrutinized 78 articles as the prospective studies on CPS for manufacturing in Industry 4.0. First, we analyzed the articles' context to identify the major components along with their associated fine-grained constituents of Industry 4.0. Then, we reviewed different studies through a number of synthesized matrices to narrate the challenges, approaches, and used techniques as the key-enablers of the CPS for manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Although the key technologies of Industry 4.0 are the CPS, Internet of Things (IoT), and Internet of Services (IoS), the human component (HC), cyber component (CC), physical component (PC), and their HC-CC, CC-PC, and HC-PC interfaces need to be standardized to achieve the success of Industry 4.0.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据