4.8 Article

Delivering Smooth Power to Pulse-Current Battery Chargers: Electric Vehicles as a Case in Point

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 1295-1302

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2020.3005929

关键词

Batteries; Control systems; Voltage control; Legged locomotion; Voltage measurement; Battery chargers; Capacitors; Battery charger (BC); charging method; dc-dc converter; electric vehicle (EV); pulse current

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a battery charger for electric vehicles based on the pulse-current charging method, which utilizes a particular topology and innovative control system to achieve smooth power transfer, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed solution.
This article proposes a battery charger for electric vehicles based on pulse-current charging method which has great distinct advantages and substantially enhances charging process. It applies positive, negative, and zero currents for each cycle. On the one hand, drastic changes in the battery current and power during the cycles appear in the output of the battery charger, negatively affect the terminal, and frequently change the output active power. This condition is also important in battery chargers which do not have dc-ac stage and are powered by other power sources, for instance, fuel cell. On the other hand, the output active and reactive powers must track constant values without any variations for participation in vehicle-to-grid technology. Thus, a particular parallel battery-capacitor topology is suggested in practice and then an innovative control system is precisely designed in order to implement pulse-current method and transfer smooth power in the presence of the intrinsic drastic changes in the battery power. The proposed system is compared with the recent pulse-current battery chargers. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the solution. This article is accompanied by a PDF file demonstrating the details.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据