4.5 Article

Reorientation of Magnetic Graphene Oxide Nanosheets in Crosslinked Quaternized Polyvinyl Alcohol as Effective Solid Electrolyte

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en9121003

关键词

graphene oxide-iron oxide (GO-Fe3O4); crosslinked quaternized polyvinyl alcohol (CL-QPVA); magnetic field; reorientation; direct methanol alkaline fuel cell (DMAFC)

资金

  1. Chang Gung Memorial University [CMRPD2F0051]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [MOST-103-2815-C-182-023-E, MOST-103-2221-E-182-064-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work aims to clarify the effect of magnetic graphene oxide (GO) reorientation in a polymer matrix on the ionic conduction and methanol barrier properties of nanocomposite membrane electrolytes. Magnetic iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles were prepared and dispersed on GO nanosheets (GO-Fe3O4). The magnetic GO-Fe3O4 was imbedded into a quaternized polyvinyl alcohol (QPVA) matrix and crosslinked (CL-) with glutaraldehyde (GA) to obtain a polymeric nanocomposite. A magnetic field was applied in the through-plane direction during the drying and film formation steps. The CL-QPVA/GO-Fe3O4 nanocomposite membranes were doped with an alkali to obtain hydroxide-conducting electrolytes for direct methanol alkaline fuel cell (DMAFC) applications. The magnetic field-reoriented CL-QPVA/GO-Fe3O4 electrolyte demonstrated higher conductivity and lower methanol permeability than the unoriented CL-QPVA/GO-Fe3O4 membrane or the CL-QPVA film. The reoriented CL-QPVA/GO-Fe3O4 nanocomposite was used as the electrolyte in a DMAFC and resulted in a maximum power density of 55.4 mW . cm(-2) at 60 degrees C, which is 73.7% higher than that of the composite without the magnetic field treatment (31.9 mW . cm(-2)). In contrast, the DMAFC using the CL-QPVA electrolyte generated only 22.4 mW . cm(-2). This research proved the surprising benefits of magnetic-field-assisted orientation of GO-Fe3O4 in facilitating the ion conduction of a polymeric electrolyte.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据