4.7 Article

Retrieving soot volume fraction fields for laminar axisymmetric diffusion flames using convolutional neural networks

期刊

FUEL
卷 285, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119011

关键词

Soot diagnostics; CoFlame code; Synthetic images; LOSA technique; Ill-posed problem; Artificial neural networks

资金

  1. Chile's ANID [FONDECYT/Regular 1191758, FONDECYT/Postdoctoral 3190860, FONDEF/IDEA ID18I10236, Basal FB0008, PCI/NSFC 190009]
  2. Direccion de Postgrado y Programas from Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a novel approach based on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for estimating the soot volume fraction fields in coflow laminar axisymmetric diffusion flames from 2D images. Experimental results show that the proposed CNN approach outperforms classical deconvolution methods when handling noisy images.
Typical procedures for estimating soot volume fraction distribution in laboratory flames require solving ill-posed inverse problems to recover the fields from convoluted signals that integrate light extinction from soot particles along the line-of-sight of a photo-detector. Classical deconvolution methods are highly sensitive to noise and the choice of tunable regularization parameters, which prevents obtaining consistent estimations even for the same reference flame settings. This paper presents a novel approach based on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for estimating the soot volume fraction fields from 2D images of line-of-sight attenuation (LOSA) measurements in coflow laminar axisymmetric diffusion flames. Using a set of reference synthetic soot volume fraction fields of canonical flames and their corresponding projected LOSA images, we trained a CNN for reconstructing soot fields from images representing the data captured by a camera. Experimental results show that the proposed CNN approach outperforms classical deconvolution methods when reconstructing the flame spatial soot distribution from noisy images of LOSA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据