4.7 Article

Use of asparaginase for acrylamide mitigation in coffee and its influence on the content of caffeine, chlorogenic acid, and caffeic acid

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 338, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128045

关键词

Coffee; Asparaginase; Acrylamide; Caffeine; Chlorogenic acid; Caffeic acid

资金

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  2. Rio de Janeiro State Research Support Foundation (FAPERJ)
  3. CNPq
  4. Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ, Pro-Science Program)
  5. Office to Coordinate Improvement of University Personnel (CAPES) [15/2014]
  6. Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A factorial design study using asparaginase treatment on arabica coffee beans showed a reduction in acrylamide content with the enzyme load, hydrolysis time, and water content as key factors. Statistical analysis revealed the importance of steam pretreatment for coffee beans, and the optimal conditions for reducing acrylamide content were identified. Asparaginase treatment did not impact the major bioactive compounds in coffee.
A factorial design with a duplicate in the central point was used to investigate the effect of treating arabica coffee beans with asparaginase. The investigated factors were enzymatic load (1000 and 5000 ASNU/Kg), water percentage (30 and 90%), and hydrolysis time (1 and 3 h). The acrylamide content was determined by UPLC-MS/MS, and the caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid and caffeine concentrations were determined by HPLC-DAD. The statistical analysis was carried out in the R platform using RStudio graphical interface. The results indicated the importance of coffee bean pretreatment with steam, and that the enzyme load reduced the acrylamide content to 65 mg/kg in coffee beans. The predicted reduction was obtained with hydrolysis time of 2 h, water content of 90%, and asparaginase load of 5000 ASNU/kg. The asparaginase treatment did not influence the major bioactive compounds in coffee.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据