4.5 Article

Microbial biosensor for Salmonella using anti-bacterial antibodies isolated from human serum

期刊

ENZYME AND MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY
卷 144, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2020.109721

关键词

Anti-Salmonella antibody; Bacterial detection; ClearColi; Impedance spectrometry

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2020R1A2B5B01002187, NRF2020R1A5A101913111]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a novel microbial biosensor for Salmonella detection based on impedance spectrometry using antibodies isolated from human serum. The isolated anti-Salmonella antibodies showed high binding affinity for S. enteritidis compared to other Gram-negative bacterial strains. The detection limit of the isolated antibodies was estimated to be 1.0 x 10(3) cells/mL for S. enteritidis and 1.0 x 10(6) cells/mL for BL21 (DE3).
In this work, we present a novel microbial biosensor for Salmonella based on impedance spectrometry by using isolated antibodies against a specific bacterial strain from human serum. Anti-Salmonella (or BL21(DE3)) antibodies were isolated from human serum using S. enteritidis (or BL21(DE3)) and the mutant strain ClearColi. After the purification steps, the purification yield of the antibodies was calculated to be 0.2 %. From the FACS analysis, the isolated anti-Salmonella antibodies were estimated to have more than 6-fold higher binding affinity for S. enteritidis compared to antibodies against other kinds of Gram-negative bacterial strains, including HB101, ClearColi, JM110, DH5 alpha, and BL21(DE3). Finally, the anti-Salmonella antibodies isolated herein were used for bacterial detection using electrochemical biosensors based on impedance spectrometry and the R-ct value of the antibodies was estimated for S. enteritidis from the Nyquist plot. The limit of detection of the isolated anti-Salmonella antibodies was estimated to be 1.0 x 10(3) cells/mL for S. enteritidis and 1.0 x 10(6) cells/mL for BL21 (DE3), respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据