4.8 Review

Electrochemical Disinfection in Water and Wastewater Treatment: Identifying Impacts of Water Quality and Operating Conditions on Performance

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 55, 期 6, 页码 3470-3482

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c06254

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrochemical disinfection, as an alternative to traditional chemical dosing methods, has attracted attention due to its potential for use in various treatment contexts without the need for transporting hazardous materials. By selecting appropriate oxidants and operating practices, the performance of electrochemical disinfection systems can be optimized while energy consumption is minimized.
Electrochemical disinfection-a method in which chemical oxidants are generated in situ via redox reactions on the surface of an electrode-has attracted increased attention in recent years as an alternative to traditional chemical dosing disinfection methods. Because electrochemical disinfection does not entail the transport and storage of hazardous materials and can be scaled across centralized and distributed treatment contexts, it shows promise for use both in resource limited settings and as a supplement for aging centralized systems. In this Critical Review, we explore the significance of treatment context, oxidant selection, and operating practice on electrochemical disinfection system performance. We analyze the impacts of water composition on oxidant demand and required disinfectant dose across drinking water, centralized wastewater, and distributed wastewater treatment contexts for both free chlorine- and hydroxyl-radical-based systems. Drivers of energy consumption during oxidant generation are identified, and the energetic performance of experimentally reported electrochemical disinfection systems are evaluated against optimal modeled performance. We also highlight promising applications and operational strategies for electrochemical disinfection and propose reporting standards for future work.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据