A decision making approach for assignment of ecosystem services to forest management units: A case study in northwest Turkey
出版年份 2020 全文链接
标题
A decision making approach for assignment of ecosystem services to forest management units: A case study in northwest Turkey
作者
关键词
Ecosystem services, Decision making, Delphi method, Assignment problem, Mixed integer programming
出版物
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
Volume 121, Issue -, Pages 107056
出版商
Elsevier BV
发表日期
2020-11-10
DOI
10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107056
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Sustainable Development Goals and the Forest Sector—a Complex Relationship
- (2019) Rupert J. Baumgartner Forests
- Combining multicriteria decision analysis and GIS to assess vulnerability within a protected area: An objective methodology for managing complex and fragile systems
- (2019) Argantonio Rodríguez-Merino et al. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
- Supporting forest conservation through community-based land use planning and participatory GIS – lessons from Crocker Range Park, Malaysian Borneo
- (2019) Keiko Ioki et al. JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION
- Applying the Delphi method to assess impacts of forest management on biodiversity and habitat preservation
- (2018) Anna Filyushkina et al. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
- Assessing nature's contributions to people
- (2018) Sandra Díaz et al. SCIENCE
- A participative approach to develop sustainability indicators for dehesa agroforestry farms
- (2018) M. Escribano et al. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
- Community Forestry and the Sustainable Development Goals: A Two Way Street
- (2018) Wil de Jong et al. Forests
- When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning
- (2018) Francis Turkelboom et al. Ecosystem Services
- A framework for integrating systematic stakeholder analysis in ecosystem services research: Stakeholder mapping for forest ecosystem services in the UK
- (2018) Susanne Raum Ecosystem Services
- Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the Sustainable Development Goals
- (2018) Sylvia L.R. Wood et al. Ecosystem Services
- Qualitative Assessment of Forest Ecosystem Services: The Stakeholders’ Point of View in Support of Landscape Planning
- (2018) Isabella De Meo et al. Forests
- Ecosystem services in global sustainability policies
- (2017) Ilse R. Geijzendorffer et al. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
- Modelling and measuring sustainable wellbeing in connection with the UN Sustainable Development Goals
- (2016) Robert Costanza et al. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
- A comparison of the concepts: Ecosystem services and forest functions to improve interdisciplinary exchange
- (2016) Elisabeth Kindler FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS
- The Delphi method as an alternative to standard committee meetings to identify ecological issues for forest ecosystem-based management: A case study
- (2016) K. Waldron et al. FORESTRY CHRONICLE
- Hybrid MCDA Methods to Integrate Multiple Ecosystem Services in Forest Management Planning: A Critical Review
- (2015) Britta Uhde et al. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
- Ecosystems and human well-being in the Sustainable Development Goals
- (2015) Sylvia LR Wood et al. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
- Spatial data, analysis approaches, and information needs for spatial ecosystem service assessments: a review
- (2015) Margaret E. Andrew et al. GIScience & Remote Sensing
- Spatial prioritisation for conserving ecosystem services: comparing hotspots with heuristic optimisation
- (2015) Matthias Schröter et al. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY
- Non-market forest ecosystem services and decision support in Nordic countries
- (2015) Anna Filyushkina et al. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
- A tiered approach for mapping ecosystem services
- (2015) Adrienne Grêt-Regamey et al. Ecosystem Services
- Comparing land-use alternatives: Using the ecosystem services concept to define a multi-criteria decision analysis
- (2013) Veronika Fontana et al. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
- The Relevance of Local Participatory Scenario Planning for Ecosystem Management Policies in the Basque Country, Northern Spain
- (2013) Igone Palacios-Agundez et al. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
- Relating ecoystem services to domains of human well-being: Foundation for a U.S. index
- (2012) Lisa M. Smith et al. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
- Use of multi-criteria analysis (MCA) for supporting community forest management
- (2012) C Khadka et al. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry
- Delphi-based change assessment in ecosystem service values to support strategic spatial planning in Italian landscapes
- (2011) Rocco Scolozzi et al. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
- Untangling the Environmentalist's Paradox: Why Is Human Well-being Increasing as Ecosystem Services Degrade?
- (2010) Ciara Raudsepp-Hearne et al. BIOSCIENCE
- Mapping indicator models: From intuitive problem structuring to quantified decision-making in sustainable forest management
- (2010) Bernhard Wolfslehner et al. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
- A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning
- (2009) Jayanath Ananda et al. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
- Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services
- (2009) Elena M. Bennett et al. ECOLOGY LETTERS
- Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management
- (2009) Mark S. Reed et al. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
- Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
- (2009) S. R. Carpenter et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management
- (2008) Benis Egoh et al. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
- Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review
- (2008) Mark S. Reed BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started