4.7 Review

Bacillus subtilis natto as a potential probiotic in animal nutrition

期刊

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 41, 期 3, 页码 355-369

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07388551.2020.1858019

关键词

Animal feed; natto; probiotic; spore-forming bacteria; biological activity; industrial requirements

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The growing global demand for animal products and processed meat has presented a challenge for the livestock sector in enhancing animal productivity while maintaining product quality. Probiotics have emerged as a natural and safe alternative to antibiotics in animal feeds, providing functional foods for animal health and ensuring food safety for consumers. Detailed studies are needed to prove the efficacy and safety of probiotics, with Bacillus subtilis natto showing no hazardous effects and demonstrating effectiveness as a probiotic in animal nutrition.
The growing global demand for animal products and processed meat has created a challenge for the livestock sector to enhance animal productivity without compromising product quality. The restriction of antibiotics in animal feeds as growth promoters makes the use of probiotics a natural and safe alternative to obtain functional foods that provide animal health and quality and to maintain food safety for consumers. To incorporate these additives into the diet, detailed studies are required, in which in vitro and in vivo assays are used to prove the efficacy and to ensure the safety of probiotic candidate strains. Studies on the use of Bacillus subtilis natto as a spore-forming probiotic bacterium in animal nutrition have shown no hazardous effects and have demonstrated the effectiveness of its use as a probiotic, mainly due to its proven antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, enzymatic, and immunomodulatory activity. This review summarizes the recent scientific background on the probiotic effects of B. subtilis natto in animal nutrition. It focuses on its safety assessment, host-associated efficacy, and industrial requirements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据