4.7 Article

Mechanical and thermal properties of artificial stone finishing materials mixed with PCM impregnated lightweight aggregate and carbon material

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 272, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121882

关键词

PCM; Lightweight aggregate; Carbon material; Artificial stone; Thermal performance

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) - Korea government(MSIT) [2019R1A2C4100284]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [4199990114246] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that impregnating carbon materials and phase change materials in lightweight aggregates can improve the thermal performance of artificial stone, but may slightly decrease compressive strength. By adjusting the type and amount of carbon materials added, thermal conductivity can be enhanced and peak temperature adjusted.
In this study, lightweight aggregates and carbon materials were impregnated with a phase change material (PCM) to improve the thermal performance of artificial stone used as an interior finishing material. The PCM used was n-octadecane; the carbon materials used in the mixture were exfoliated graphite nanoplatelets, activated carbon, and biochar. The compressive strength was slightly lower in the specimens with PCM; it was found that PCM can affect the adhesion of the cement paste and aggregate. When carbon materials are used in the mixtures, the thermal conductivity is improved. Depending on the type and amount of carbon material added, the thermal conductivity can be improved and the peak temperature adjusted. The combination of PCM and carbon materials allows for high latent heat capacity, efficient use of thermal energy through efficient storage and release, sustainable thermal stability and durability, and peak temperature control. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据