4.7 Article

Hydrothermal treatment on depolymerization of hemicellulose of mango seed shell for the production of xylooligosaccharides

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 253, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117274

关键词

Mango waste; Xylooligosaccharides; Xylan; Waste valorization; Lignocellulosic biomass

资金

  1. CAPES-PRINT [88887.310560/2018-00]
  2. FAPESP [2019/08542-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrothermal processing is a promising biorefinery technology for converting lignocellulosic biomass into biofuels and biocompounds by selectively solubilizing and depolymerizing hemicellulose, with potential for obtaining xylooligosaccharides suitable for prebiotic applications.
Hydrothermal processing is an interesting biorefinery technology for converting lignocellulosic biomass into biofuels and biocompounds. This process is based on the selective solubilization and depolymerization of hemicellulose fraction (xylan) and may be considered beneficial, due to the possibility of obtaining xylooligosaccharides (XOS) with a degree of polymerization (DP) suitable for prebiotic applications. This study evaluated the effect of pressure (2.5 and 10 MPa) in a kinetic study (30 min) of hydrothermal treatment (180 degrees C) to optimize the extraction of XOS from mango seed shell. Total reducing sugars (TRS) values were close to the maximum in 15 min showing a slower rate for both pressures after this time, but at 10 MPa the value was 20 % lower than at 2.5 MPa. Based on these results, a new extraction was performed at 2.5 MPa and 15 min, and the extracted XOS were quantified, yielding 393.44 mg XOS/g xylan. XOS with a degree of polymerization between X2-X6 corresponded to 82.24 mg/g and XOS with X > 6 (or soluble xylan) corresponded to 311.20 mg/g. A low amount of xylose (8.81 mg/g xylan) was released, resulting in a hemicellulose conversion of 40.2 %. In general, approximately 8.1 kg of total XOS was produced from 100 kg of dried mango seed shell (X2-X6-1.7 kg and X > 6-6.4 kg).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据