4.6 Article

One-step separation and immobilization of his-tagged enzyme directly from cell lysis solution by biomimetic mineralization approach

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 167, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2020.107893

关键词

Separation; Enzyme immobilization; Biomimetic mineralization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21878131, 22078133, 21676124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a simple method to separate and immobilize histagged enzymes directly from cell lysis solution through a single biomineralization step, without the need for support preparation. The results demonstrate that this approach significantly enhances enzyme activity recovery and separation efficiency, while also exhibiting excellent reusability.
We report a facile approach to fabricate biocatalyst, which is the BglucLH-Cu-3(PO4)(2) nanoflowers (BglucH-NF) possessed microscale flower-like structure assembled with nanoscale petals, by integrating the separation and immobilization of his-tagged enzyme directly from cell lysis solution in a single biomineralization step without the preparation of support. The recombinant beta-glucosidase-linker-His (BglucLH) being rich in imidazole group was constructed to enhance the specific binding of enzyme with copper ions. We have demonstrated that the activity recovery and separation efficiency of BglucLH-NF were improved by 253.2 % and 290.1 % in comparison with Bgluc-Cu-3(PO4)(2) nanoflowers (Bgluc-NF), indicating the positive reinforcement of his-tag for improving separation and immobilization efficiency. The BglucLH-NF could maintain 73.2 +/- 2.77 % of the initial activity after repeating 15 cycles, exhibiting excellent reusability. The integrated separation and immobilization of histagged enzyme directly from cell lysis solution by biomimetic mineralization approach displays great potential in the convenient fabrication of biocatalyst with high enzyme loading, stability, and recyclability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据