4.6 Article

A novel clarification approach for intensified monoclonal antibody processes with 100 million cells/mL using a single-use fluidized bed centrifuge

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 167, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2020.107887

关键词

Fluidized bed centrifuge; High cell density; Clarification; Monoclonal antibody; Single-use; Downstream

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study investigated the use of a single-use (SU) fluidized bed centrifuge (FBC) system to clarify high cell density (HCD) broths, achieving a 95% product recovery rate and superior cell viability, while minimizing the release of host cell impurities.
Intensified high cell density (HCD) processes for the production of therapeutic proteins have already reached cell concentrations up to 100 million cells/mL (> 300 g/L wet cell weight, WCW). The clarification of such HCD processes using technologies established for conventional fed-batch processes (< 100 g/L WCW) is faced with low biomass loading capacities and relatively low product recoveries, which limit their applicability. This and the growing demand for single-use (SU) technologies increases the pressure to develop scalable, robust and cost-effective SU based HCD clarification solutions. Therefore, in this study a SU fluidized bed centrifuge (FBC) system was investigated to clarify HCD broths with 100 million cells/mL from a monoclonal antibody production process. FBC parameters including process volumes and flow rates during the FBC operating steps were optimized so that an almost complete removal of biomass and product recoveries of 95 % were achieved. In addition, the mild centrifugation conditions were demonstrated by the superior cell viability for the separated cells while minimizing release of host cell impurities. Furthermore, a post-centrifugal filter screening showed acceptable turbidities below 5 NTU of the sterile filtrate. This concept of FBC with subsequent filtration offers excellent potential to achieve a robust HCD clarification process solution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据